AI Usage: Are You Vibing or Building? Your Wallet Might Know

AI Usage: Are You Vibing or Building? Your Wallet Might Know

Table of Contents

This post was originally published on Israeli Tech Radar.

Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing how we work and create. We’re using it for everything from drafting quick emails to designing complex systems. But how we interact with AI — the “usage model” — significantly impacts both the results we get and the money we spend, if your not spending money on A.I / plan to but not dure on what stay tuned and lets start thinking in “token” which might fit in to 2 code categories:

captionless image

🖥️ Vibing with the AI: The Decoder Model

This is the most common way many people currently use AI. It’s the back-and-forth chat, the quick question, the request for a draft. The AI acts like a decoder, taking your input and spitting out a relevant response.

Think of it like brainstorming with a helpful but sometimes unfocused assistant. You throw out ideas, and it gives you reactions and suggestions.

Examples:

  • Asking for various email drafts
  • Getting summaries of articles
  • Generating social media posts on the fly
  • Quick coding snippets
  • Generating presentations

The Cost Factor: This model often operates on a per-token basis. You pay for each piece of text you input and each piece the AI generates. While the cost per token might seem small, the sheer volume of interactions can quickly add up.

It’s easy to fall into the trap of generating multiple options, refining prompts repeatedly, and essentially “chatting” your way to a higher bill without a clear plan.

I have my share of vibe sessions which got me no where in terms of results and i’ve had some well planned ones which were worth while, some tools work better that others, the most important part I find in vibing that with the terminal / console based experiences it’s like the A.I driven shell from Warp / Claude Code / Gemini and Open source solutions such as opencode we have this super-charged terminal that can be instructed to do so many things for the cost of more tokens …

Choosing the right model for the job will help you control those, and you need to learn how to delegate and switch some of the toolings out there may recommend them for you but you will have to learn and choose what kind of tasks you want to take on your own and what you wish to delegate.

And for that purpose you have the planning phase …

🏗️ Building with the AI: The Architect Model

This is a much more structured and deliberate use of an AI. It’s about solving a complex problem that requires planning, reasoning, and a structured output. The AI acts more like an architect or a thinker.

Think of it like collaborating with an experienced consultant who helps you design a complete solution, not just react to immediate requests.

Examples:

  • Designing a marketing strategy
  • Outlining a complex software architecture
  • Generating detailed business plans
  • Creating a multi-step project roadmap

The Cost Factor:

This model often involves a higher cost per interaction or even a different pricing structure altogether. The AI needs more computational power and time to “think” and plan before generating a response. You’re paying for its reasoning capabilities, not just the raw number of tokens.

However, a well-planned interaction can lead to a more valuable and efficient outcome, potentially saving you time and resources in the long run, understanding these two usage models is crucial for being efficient and cost-effective. Choose your AI interaction model with intention, and you’ll be able to harness its power without unnecessary expense.

It’s more than just an advanced search … , you pay for your in-accuracy ;)

If your just practicing “advanced search with A.I” which may help for the some common use-cases the standard GPT’s and their free tier could take you a long way, may it be vibing or building , it might get you some good starting point for free and in some cases you may find yourself spending more than your gaining … .

There is an abundence of assitants — more than you can use

For individuals the breakdown may be quite simple looking at a bill of one of the 3 big vendors our there and for coders such as myself, I may find myself with a cursor / claude / kiro monthly costs that slowly grow.

For an organization it might be quite a challenging task which we will tackle in my next post in this series, stay tuned.

Haggai Philip.

comments powered by Disqus

Related Posts

Terraform - the Defacto Tool for Infrastructure Provisioning

Terraform - the Defacto Tool for Infrastructure Provisioning

In this introduction session by Haggai Philip Zagury, DevOps Architect from Tikal, we will learn Terraform basics, starting from the basics to modules and some small tips and tricks you pick-up along the way.

Read More
From yak shaving to mastering tasks

From yak shaving to mastering tasks

Originally posted on the Israeli Tech Radar on medium.

TLDR; This is a quick share of a neat tool which found it’s way into my toolset, it did it in such a significant way which enabled me to combine tools in a common way — something I’ve been missing for quite a while. This is also a thank you to the author’s and contributors of go-task which is such an awesome tool.

Read More
AWS KMS Best Practices: Securing the Secret Ingredients of Your Infrastructure

AWS KMS Best Practices: Securing the Secret Ingredients of Your Infrastructure

TL;DR

AWS KMS gives you three flavors of encryption keys — AWS-owned, AWS-managed, and Customer Managed Keys (CMKs). For anything resembling production, CMKs are the only real choice: they give you control over rotation, deletion, cross-account access, and most critically — the ability to kill a key in an emergency. Think of KMS like a hotel’s key management system: the entrance guard has one master card, but the security manager holds the safe with all the master keys. Designing your KMS strategy right is what keeps you from handing that safe to an attacker.

Read More